Meet the new collagen formula taking Britain by storm: Why? Because research shows it reduces fine lines and wrinkles in just 28 days*!

'Perfick!': Catherine Zeta-Jones shares 32-year-old throwback snap from the set of The Darling Buds of May Love Island fans left confused as they work out Jack Keating likely conceived baby BEFORE going on show while he insists he's 'still single' In his suit, he says the image of him as a baby is “sexually graphic” - likening it to “child pornography.” Despite previous reports that have said Elden was paid $250 for appearing on the cover, his lawsuit alleges that he was never paid and his parents never signed a release allowing for the photo to be used for that purpose.A Place In The Sun's Jonnie Irwin looks in good spirits as he joins wife Jessica Holmes at restaurant opening in Newcastle amid tragic cancer battle Since then, Elden has recreated the infamous image (with swim trunks on) for milestone anniversaries for the album, but as the 30th-anniversary of Nevermind approaches, Elden has reconsidered how he feels about his naked image on the album. Elden was photographed as a four-month-old by a friend of the family for the album cover. He filed the suit in August 2021 and now, for the first time, a member of Nirvana - Dave Grohl - is addressing the controversy and says the band does have plans to change the image. That baby is now 30-year-old Spencer Elden, who is now suing the surviving members of Nirvana for what he claims is sexual exploitation.

It shows a baby, naked underwater, swimming toward a dollar bill that’s caught on a fish hook. The 1991 Nirvana Nevermind album is one of the most recognizable album covers of all time. Dave Grohl responds to the Nirvana Nevermind cover album dispute and allegations of sexual exploitation

Nirvana nevermind cover controversy